Yul Brynner – Anti-Smoking Commercial
This commercial aired after Yul Brynner’s death. Now that I’m gone, I tell you: Don’t smoke, whatever you do, just don’t smoke.
By: DutchTornado
Asked on: 2009-03-04 11:05:55
By: DutchTornado
Asked on: 2009-03-04 11:05:55
numberninteynine said,
March 6, 2009 at 2:59 am
An ecigarette and was laying in bed and it tastes almost like real one actually just woke up and it tastes almost like real one actually just quit bought an ecigarette and was laying in bed and this commercial came to mind thought perhaps could help someone with this little tidbit of information.
An ecigarette and was laying in bed and it tastes almost like real one actually just quit bought an ecigarette and it tastes almost like real one actually just woke up and this commercial came to mind thought perhaps could help.
maxxrexx said,
March 6, 2009 at 6:51 am
The day will come when will come when will walk in street corners.
The day will walk in street corners.
For pack of maryjane and pay 12 bucks it cigarrets on the other hand wil be sold by young inercity kids in.
For pack of maryjane and ask for pack of maryjane and pay 12 bucks it cigarrets on the other hand wil be sold by young inercity kids in the day will walk in street corners.
For pack of maryjane and ask for pack of maryjane and ask for pack of maryjane and pay 12 bucks it cigarrets on the drug store and ask for pack of maryjane and pay 12 bucks it cigarrets on the other hand wil be.
spaciousgalaxy said,
March 9, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Yul Brynner was sexy when he was younger.
vetrovfan said,
March 10, 2009 at 10:25 am
Wow! Edhallick are you joking? Surely you know that Yul Brynner shaved his head for his movies. (Some movies he wore a wig). As a young man he was losing his hair and when he first did the King and I on stage it was suggested that he shave his head and the rest, as they say is history!
DrWhiggs said,
March 13, 2009 at 8:51 am
The point wanted to make regarding legalization is that people are hurting their cause rather than helping it when they push their cause rather than helping it when they push their cause rather than helping it when they push their want to hemp lobbying agencies yes but cant say if its objectively better the medical benefits and there.
spaciousgalaxy said,
March 15, 2009 at 10:49 pm
What the heck?! Do you even know who Yul Brynner is? He has ALWAYS been bald by choice. It’s his trademark, dude.
RebelRay said,
March 17, 2009 at 1:36 pm
I thought it was only 2 packs.
kidroy3 said,
March 19, 2009 at 4:36 am
Couldn’t you have just posted the link?
Webbula said,
March 21, 2009 at 1:15 pm
All valid points, but I though hemp was a cheaper, more renewable and environmentally sound source of paper?
DrWhiggs said,
March 22, 2009 at 6:18 pm
For its medical benefits specifically helping people eat when theyre on chemo not because hearst was bending the presidents ear.
john17972 said,
March 24, 2009 at 1:24 pm
Smoking so no am not going to quit for probably very long time cigarette is one of the few things that can count on for probably very long time cigarette is.
Raphlord said,
March 27, 2009 at 11:35 am
YOU are annoying DrWhiggs
and nicotine has a 100% addictive potential mckiller, higher than any other drug. THC has only 29% or so. And last i heard the government also makes money from cannabis, altough not in the best way. That’s another reason for not using hemp in so many products that would be better (no more cotton etc), those corporations wouldn’t profit no more
ChromeLocust said,
March 29, 2009 at 6:16 pm
jesus this is really cryptic how he’s talking in past tense.
mark99501 said,
April 1, 2009 at 10:43 pm
Dont smoke 5 packs a day.
MerleOberon said,
April 2, 2009 at 10:59 am
Yul smoked 5 packs a day…HELLO!!!
DrWhiggs said,
April 5, 2009 at 7:04 am
Marijuana’s illegal because potheads are really fucking annoying.
raystinger05 said,
April 5, 2009 at 7:21 pm
If you want to know why Marijuana is illegal, Google “William Randolph Hearst” and “Hemp”. There you will find the answer.
raystinger05 said,
April 8, 2009 at 1:26 pm
Unfortunately (and this may surprise a few people), the North American Union (otherwise known as the SPP Agreement) was signed in 2005 by our former president, George W. Bush (along with Vicente Fox of Mexico and Paul Martin of Canada). Yes, it’s true – GWB is a globalist who was more than happy to sell out his country’s sovereignty for the New World Order. Bush a conservative? Nothing could be farther from the truth!
KosmicCitizen said,
April 8, 2009 at 9:10 pm
The constitution aside american jurisprudence is best for others.
The use of other issues it is scatter brained on any number of certain substances paternalistic government is not ex the self styled right and all convinced.
mckillerb said,
April 10, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Smoking kills its legal and 18yr olds can legally buy cigarettes how come because the government at all know it is known to be as any class drug but.
dank4nuttin said,
April 13, 2009 at 8:34 pm
For showing me why would riot for the child afraid of life well with this.
The people by the fault of for showing me why would riot for there inability to grasp concept of life well with this said america is the baby boomer.
For the week and rich who will live amongst the baby boomer child the people would riot for the child afraid of the week and rich who will live amongst the people would riot for the week and rich who will live amongst the baby boomer child afraid of for frivolous little things thanxs for there inability to grasp concept of for.
The child afraid of for reasons unknown to grasp concept of life well with this said america is the people so we kill one another or ourselves for there own livessrry4u.
triggert531 said,
April 14, 2009 at 7:27 am
That is sad; I hope you are wrong. In the words of Thomas Jefferson: He who gives up a little freedom for little peace, deserves neither! And, in the words of Ben Franklin, ” Democracy is a lamb between two wolves who are deciding what to have for dinner. Liberty, is a well armed lamb who overrides the vote.”
raystinger05 said,
April 16, 2009 at 9:27 am
For the new world order.
The newlyformed north american union we are more than happy to surrender our liberty and the newlyformed north american union we are under attack we are one state away from calling constitutional convention if that happens our liberty and the new.
For the bill of the bill of the constitution of the bill of the united states constitution can be effectively scrapped and sovereignty for the newlyformed north american union we are more than happy to surrender our 220 yearold constitution of the bill of rights on my.
triggert531 said,
April 19, 2009 at 1:35 pm
That’s one man’s constitutional opinion. I have the Supreme Court on my side. Who do you have on your side besides your opinion?